Jump to content

Summer Transfer Window 2019


Lineker

Recommended Posts

Luiz definitely needed to go but it's awkward that we weren't able to bring anyone in to replace him. Come the end of the ban we'll desperately need players in just about every position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Quote

The Church of England and healthcare professionals have criticised the footballer Wayne Rooney over his transfer to Derby County, which involves a lucrative deal to promote a betting company.

The former England captain has signed with the Championship side for a reported salary of £90,000 a week, part of which will be paid by the online casino 32Red. He will also wear the number 32 shirt for the club, it was announced on Tuesday as part of his multimillion-pound overall deal.

Dr Alan Smith, the bishop of St Albans and the church’s gambling spokesman, said celebrities must have a greater awareness of the impact of their choices and that Rooney should refuse to wear the shirt.

“Stars need to wake up to the fact they’re doing their fans no favours by wearing gambling logos,” he told the Guardian. “There is a clear academic consensus on the impact these types of adverts have on children.

“Rooney should take the lead and stand up for his fans by refusing to wear this shirt. If young footballers see a national treasure refusing to sully his personal brand and taking a moral stand it will better protect families from gambling-related harm both now and in the future.”

A group of leading healthcare professionals and academics, including Dr Henrietta Bowden-Jones, also condemned Derby’s decision to require Rooney to wear the number 32 shirt and called on the government to ban gambling sponsorship.

“There is now a substantial body of evidence which shows the impact of gambling advertising on children,” the group said in a letter. “International evidence also shows that children and young people are influenced by the behaviour of their heroes.

“The worldwide deregulation of gambling has been accompanied by a proliferation of advertising, promotion and sponsorship.”

They said politicians in Australia, Belgium and Italy had introduced restrictions, and criticised the British government for being “reluctant to act” and preferring “self-regulation and industry-led responsible gambling campaigns”.

“Acting now will help to prevent the next generation of gambling harm,” the letter concluded.

32Red was fined £2m last year for repeatedly failing to help a problem gambler. It offered the customer VIP status and free bonuses instead of advice as he deposited more than £750,000 over two years.

Newspapers have highlighted how Rooney previously admitted that his own gambling losses had been “stupid”.

“I had an idea I was doing badly and did what most gamblers do,” he wrote in his autobiography. “I chased my bets and tried to recoup my losses by putting on bigger sums. Eventually the story appeared in the newspapers. In a way I’m glad it did all come out. It shocked me into realising how much I’d been betting and losing and how stupid I’d been.”

Half of the Premier League’s teams will feature a gambling company’s logo on their shirts during the 2019-20 season, and that figure rises to 17 out of 24 clubs in the second-tier Championship.

In February, the Church of England’s governing body called for tighter regulation around gambling advertising.

“More children gamble each week than drink, smoke or take drugs,” Smith said at the time. “This generational scandal sees young people immersed in social media and tech platforms where the gambling industry relentlessly promote their products as part of a £1.5bn annual spend … Gambling advertising is pervasive and is remembered and understood by young people.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick google has told me that half of the teams in the Premier League and 17 of the 24 championship clubs are sponsored by betting companies.

That's wild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could have saved the quick google by reading the exact same stat in Linekers post. 😛

Interestingly we've now got a crypto currency firm as a sleeve sponsor which is probably even worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Colly said:

You could have saved the quick google by reading the exact same stat in Linekers post. 😛

I required independent verification :shifty:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Adam said:

Is it even legal for Rooney's wages to be part-paid by a betting company? If that actually is the case. Surely it shouldn't be?

Why shouldn't it be?

It's just like any sponsor coming in and giving the club money to subsidise signings and wages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose it depends how the contract is worked out. I don't know, I was genuinely asking. I've not heard of a player's wages being subsidised by a sponsor before, even if every club comprises their budget incorporating sponsorship money. Derby wouldn't be paying anybody £90k a week without a specific deal being agreed with the betting company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Adam said:

I suppose it depends how the contract is worked out. I don't know, I was genuinely asking. I've not heard of a player's wages being subsidised by a sponsor before, even if every club comprises their budget incorporating sponsorship money. Derby wouldn't be paying anybody £90k a week without a specific deal being agreed with the betting company.

There are plenty of instances, I beleive Pogba's move to United had a lot of influence and money involved with Adidas, Fiat agreed to pay more money to Juve for the Ronaldo transfer last season and de Jong's move to Barcelona was apparently a choice motivated by Nike willing to subsidise and pay him more than if he had chose a move to PSG.  Eyeballs on your, or even the right, product means more people are willing to give up more cash.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rich said:

Eyeballs on your, or even the right, product means more people are willing to give up more cash.

Especially if you are sponsored by contact lenses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was gonna remark how weird it would be that Scott Carson is gonna end up with a Premier League winners medal, but upon checking he apparently already has a Champions League medal from when Liverpool won it in 2005.

Scott Carson: Champions League Winner. Signing makes total sense now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jericode said:

I was gonna remark how weird it would be that Scott Carson is gonna end up with a Premier League winners medal, but upon checking he apparently already has a Champions League medal from when Liverpool won it in 2005.

Scott Carson: Champions League Winner. Signing makes total sense now.

Almost as bizarre as Jonathan Greening, Champions League winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. To learn more, see our Privacy Policy