Jump to content

stephenbutler

Members
  • Posts

    398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About stephenbutler

  • Birthday 14/12/1990

Profile Information

  • Pronouns
    Male
  • Location
    Australia
  • Interests
    Wrestling and Music

Recent Profile Visitors

2,167 profile views

stephenbutler's Achievements

Enhancement Talent

Enhancement Talent (3/12)

32

Reputation

  1. He killed BSC and replaced it with some crappy rap-based promotion!! I am disappoint... But apart from that, this game is sick...I love having all the little info boxes and there is a sense of realism with the 'scouting' feature. Wrestlers who are more renowned have a more accurate representation of their stats, while unknowns would have a more broad review irl.
  2. Bro, why you hatin' on Maddox and The Miz? Both guys, while not spectacular, are both decent enough in the ring to not be utter embarrassments. You act like Miz is the worst wrestler in the world. 5 years ago, you might've been right...but he has improved leaps and bounds in that time! And you're suggesting 30/32 for Maddox? Really? REALLY? 50 is the middle ground, so that'd be 'your average wrestler'. You think he is much worse than the middle ground? That's ridiculous! Aksana, for example, has 32 for speed and 44 for Technical...you actually think Brad Maddox is worse than Aksana (who is one of the worst Divas in WWE). I'm sorry, but I completely disagree with this suggested stat drop. I also think you need to take a chill pill. In this topic, at least, if you are challenged in anyway, you retort back, all defensive. It's cool that you try and help out by suggesting stats, but 1. Don't be so defensive if challenged...be respectful...and 2. Try and back up your suggestions with a bit more than 'He's worse than The Miz'. The Miz's stats in the October update, are 72/53/56...which are about right. Maddox has 51/71/59 (as I said about, at least 50 for each stat). If you want to refute those stats, go for it, but give evidence, rather than 'Maddox sucks, lower them!' Use a match or two as an example. Just a few tips...
  3. When I think of Superstar Look and who has it, I imagine the wrestler walking into a crowded room of people who've never seen them. A guy like The Rock, John Cena or Chris Jericho would turn heads and would have people talking about them, since they look larger than life, or unique, like a movie star/rock star. Where as a guy like Daniel Bryan wouldn't get a second glance, since he looks like an average guy. Someone with Superstar Look can get get over because of their look, at least with the casual fans. While Bryan needed the underdog effect, and actual skill, to get over. Diva's are tougher, since I'm sure a majority of them would turn heads when they walk in a room. But let's use examples. Trish Stratus = Superstar Look...she looks like more than just a pretty face/hot body. Lita is the same. They have an 'X' Factor. They can get over as stars because of how they look, even Torrie, who wasn't much of a wrestler, looked more of a star than most of the roster. Chyna and Beth look like they could bat up some of the superstars, let alone the Divas...which is why they are stars. AJ, however, is only over because she is a geek, which most male wrestling fans dig, and she is entertaining. But just looking at her, she doesn't look like she belongs...she is tiny and dresses like a teenager. That's why I'd remove SS Look for her, even though I adore her. Also, I'd agree with removing SS Look from Rosa and Naomi, since Rosa is bland and Naomi needed athleticism/sex appeal to get over, neither of which deserve SS Look, but Kaitlyn and Alicia both look like 'more than Divas', imo. This is my thought on the issue, feel free to counter this, since I'm sure someone will disagree (especially on the topic of Bryan ).
  4. Playing through Emerald. Decided to challenge myself and picked Treecko. Saved in Slateport City with 1 badge. Team: Gordon (Grovyle) Level 17 Scout (Zigzagoon) Level 14 Ronnie (Aron) Level 16 Squishy (Tentacool) Level 14
  5. Anything to do with Pokemon, and I'm in! I have at least one game from every Gen, so any are good...but I'd be happiest with Kanto or Hoenn.
  6. I checked in the latest update and New Jack/Lawler don't have a hate or dislike relationship at all...but based on New Jack's tweets yesterday, I think he might dislike Lawler...just a bit...Not sure if the Twitter rants of a lunatic are grounds enough for a relationship, but I've seen weaker reasoning for relationships in this thread. Based on the game mechanics, pretty sure New Jack would hate being on the same roster as Lawler...and vice versa (mostly Lawler fearing his safety) which for me means it should be in the game.
  7. NOOOO! Not Konrad!! He was great for BY2G!! Seriously though, thanks for all the work you do!! I tried to make an updated Cornellverse update two weeks ago and gave up after three days...it was too much work. So kudos to you!!
  8. Yeah, I'll give you some random workers later tonight...though they may be fairly generic
  9. Shawn Waters Wrestling (SWW): Regional with 60 PI, Risk: 80, Advertising: 10%, Production: 25%, Merchandise: 5%, Money: $2500000 ROSTER TITLES, EVENTS AND STAFF
  10. I've got one. It's a regional promotion created by a wrestler who has been blacklisted from most other wrestling companies due to his ego. He thinks he can run a company better than anyone else. If you want to add this, I can give you stats and rosters etc.
  11. Marcus Anthony is Lincoln Broderick. The Who posted a pic of him above
  12. Maybe they want to debut him on the main roster? I don't know whether it will happen, as he is apparently in the doghouse...but for all we know, they might be really high on him and want him to make a big impact.
  13. http://www.ewrestlin...released-by-wwe Remove Kharma from WWE. http://www.411mania.com/wrestling/news/246188/UPDATE:-Kharma-Moved-to-Alumni-Roster.htm Wait until we get official confirmation. At the moment she is still on the Superstars page. It could be true, but it could also be a mistake.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. To learn more, see our Privacy Policy