Jump to content

Thomas

Members
  • Posts

    2,625
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Thomas

  1. Sick bastard because he's ugly and I don't want to see it. Stop taking things so seriously.

    And Jimmy, Ziggy reminds me of Bateman too. One of the first things I thought, actually. And I can see Carole finishing higher than Jonty and Ziggy. She's got her audience. If it were voting for who you want to go out, sure, she'd be the first out, but it's not.

  2. What do you have to do to get a penalty at Old Trafford? One handball that was stonewall, and a foul on Berbatov that would've been given at any other ground.

    Personally, I dis-agree. It was not stonewall, because cameras do not prove that it hit his arm. I thought it hit his chest, and afterwards Wes Brown came out and said that's where it hit him. To be honest, I wouldn't see any reason why he'd have to lie about it. The match is over, and United won, so no need to lie.

    As far as the Berbatov one goes. If you can say that Vidic fouled him, without even knowing Berbatov was around, then fair enough, penalty. Vidic's eyes were on the ball, nothing else. It wasn't as if he took one look over to see where Berb was, and then just checked the run he made, it was just a clash between the two.

    The only reason so much is being made about these incidents by non-United fans is the fact that you "don't get penalties at OT" - Now, there's been many in the past that haven't been given and I agree should have been, but I firmly believe Spurs shouldn't have had one yesterday.

    Out of the two, if any was gonna be given, the Wes Brown one would have...If you watch the Berb-Vidic incident any more than once, you'll clearly see why it's no penalty.

    I may get ridiculed for saying this, simply because I'm a United fan. I just hope that a non-United fan agrees with me on it.

    I agree, but it's something Liverpool fans say a lot.

  3. What do you have to do to get a penalty at Old Trafford? One handball that was stonewall, and a foul on Berbatov that would've been given at any other ground.

    Personally, I dis-agree. It was not stonewall, because cameras do not prove that it hit his arm. I thought it hit his chest, and afterwards Wes Brown came out and said that's where it hit him. To be honest, I wouldn't see any reason why he'd have to lie about it. The match is over, and United won, so no need to lie.

    As far as the Berbatov one goes. If you can say that Vidic fouled him, without even knowing Berbatov was around, then fair enough, penalty. Vidic's eyes were on the ball, nothing else. It wasn't as if he took one look over to see where Berb was, and then just checked the run he made, it was just a clash between the two.

    The only reason so much is being made about these incidents by non-United fans is the fact that you "don't get penalties at OT" - Now, there's been many in the past that haven't been given and I agree should have been, but I firmly believe Spurs shouldn't have had one yesterday.

    Out of the two, if any was gonna be given, the Wes Brown one would have...If you watch the Berb-Vidic incident any more than once, you'll clearly see why it's no penalty.

    I may get ridiculed for saying this, simply because I'm a United fan. I just hope that a non-United fan agrees with me on it.

  4. It's pretty complicated...

    We agreed a fee with Benfica for their 50% of Fernandes (£6m), and also agreed a fee (£6m) for the other 50% owned by a third party. Everythnig was going nicely and Fernandes had told everyone at the club he'd sign when Valencia offered £10m for the 50% share Benfica own of Fernandes. This was beneficial for Benfica because they get £4m more for the transfer, and the third party can continue to make cash from Fernandes as they did before.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. To learn more, see our Privacy Policy