EWB Fantasy Football B-League

[mystikz]

Beanie Wells, RB, ARI

I hate you!

[Berober]

My bad, still trying to gather my bearings, I'll be ready for the next round.

[Guest jaywhyte]

Sidney Rice - WR - Seahawks

[bill_da_bill]

Sorry Jay, I gave Rice to berober.

[bill_da_bill]

Nice pick Munky with Ryan Williams going down.

I'll update things tonight when I'm not on my phone.

[Guest jaywhyte]

alright... Kenny Britt then

[Mysterio2000X]

Beanie Wells, RB, ARI

I don't know if I trust him or not. He's injury prone and ridiculously inconsistent.

But, he has tons of potential, and if ever there was a year for him to realize some of it, this would be it. Solid choice.

[munky]

Beanie Wells, RB, ARI

I don't know if I trust him or not. He's injury prone and ridiculously inconsistent.

But, he has tons of potential, and if ever there was a year for him to realize some of it, this would be it. Solid choice.

I figure he's worth the shot for my RB2. I fully expect him to either get hurt or just shit the bed altogether.

[bill_da_bill]

Per his list, davidmarrio is going to select...

Pittsburgh Steelers Defense

And than I am going to go with...

Michael Crabtree, WR - San Francisco 49ers

I'd feel much better about this with someone other than Alex Smith throwing the ball, but I am hopeful Harbaugh can make this a somewhat average offense and Crabtree can break loose.

[The Heartbreak Kid]

New York Jets Defense

[Mysterio2000X]

What the fuck, we're taking defenses already?!?!

edit - Oh right, I'm next.

I'll take Mario Manningham. Value's too good not to.

Edited August 22, 2011 by Mysterio2000X

[Guest jaywhyte]

What the fuck, we're taking defenses already?!?!

edit - Oh right, I'm next.

I'll take Mario Manningham. Value's too good not to.

My thoughts...

I don't like the negative points defenses "earn" you so I'll probably take a defense last.

[sahyder1]

What the fuck, we're taking defenses already?!?!

edit - Oh right, I'm next.

I'll take Mario Manningham. Value's too good not to.

My thoughts...

I don't like the negative points defenses "earn" you so I'll probably take a defense last.

Yeah, I don't understand why we don't reward teams for getting lit up and allowing 40+ points either.

Edited August 22, 2011 by sahyder1

[The Heartbreak Kid]

I just took the Jets' Defense because I didn't see them being there by the next time I pick. If nobody else picks up any defenses by the time I go again, I guess I look like a fool. But I guess we will see.

Edited August 22, 2011 by Disturbed

[Guest jaywhyte]

What the fuck, we're taking defenses already?!?!

edit - Oh right, I'm next.

I'll take Mario Manningham. Value's too good not to.

My thoughts...

I don't like the negative points defenses "earn" you so I'll probably take a defense last.

Yeah, I don't understand why we don't reward teams for getting lit up and allowing 40+ points either.

I didn't say anything about rewarding. 0 points would be fine.

[mystikz]

meh way too early for defenses but that's fine with me.

Manningham was on my list, didn't think he'd last much longer though.

[sahyder1]

What the fuck, we're taking defenses already?!?!

edit - Oh right, I'm next.

I'll take Mario Manningham. Value's too good not to.

My thoughts...

I don't like the negative points defenses "earn" you so I'll probably take a defense last.

Yeah, I don't understand why we don't reward teams for getting lit up and allowing 40+ points either.

I didn't say anything about rewarding. 0 points would be fine.

If your team gets lit up that you deserve to be penalized.

[Guest jaywhyte]

What the fuck, we're taking defenses already?!?!

edit - Oh right, I'm next.

I'll take Mario Manningham. Value's too good not to.

My thoughts...

I don't like the negative points defenses "earn" you so I'll probably take a defense last.

Yeah, I don't understand why we don't reward teams for getting lit up and allowing 40+ points either.

I didn't say anything about rewarding. 0 points would be fine.

If your team gets lit up that you deserve to be penalized.

Well if your quarterback throws 5 INT's don't you think he should be penalized too?

I just don't see the point in penalizing 1 position that's all. Give everyone a penalization for QB INT, RB Fumble, WR Drop, TE Drop, Kicker Missed FG, etc. Why only penalize the defense/special teams "position"?

Not arguing the rules you're just being a real ass and I make a valid point, so yeah... suck on these nuts

[The Heartbreak Kid]

Interceptions: -2

Fumbles Lost: -2

Edited August 22, 2011 by Disturbed

[sahyder1]

To add to what distubed posted

Field Goals Missed 0-19 Yards: -5

A little bit of reading can be good for you.