TheLastInLine

Would you care to elaborate?

That's not an excuse. In the first Marvel Studio's Hulk movie and the first two thirds of the Avengers they portray him as a mindless brute. You either stick to that and give us an explanation for why he suddenly can control himself or you don't portray him like that. This is inconsistent writing. But apart from that I LOVE that movie.

I never noticed that. It is weird. But to be honest, I never had a problem with Batman killing people. And I'm not just talking abut the movies. Just think about how many lives he could save if he would just kill the Joker. What doesn't sit right with me is when he dies it with a Smile on his face like in Batman Returns when he shoves that bomb in the fat clown's pants and pushes him down the shaft or whatever that was. That one always bothered me, even as a kid. Like, no body saw the GIANT marshmallow monster trashing the streets of New York? The entire city turned their heads in unison? Even if you're the biggest anti-supernaturalist it is pretty hard to find a rational explanation for this one. Iron Man 3 Harry Potter - Deathly Hollows Edit 2: Terminator 3: How come all the events in Terminator 3 still happen? All the chips that served as a template for or inspired them to create Skynet were destroyed, the guy that came up with Skynet is dead and I doubt that they could create smoething like Skynet just from that part of the arm that was left behind. It was established that Skynet was reverse-engineered from the CPU. So theoretically Skynet doesn't exist. But I guess we could shalk that up to "nobody ever got time-travel right". Avengers: When did Bruce Banner learn to control his anger? The whole movie he was scared about not having control over himself once he turns into the Hulk. That is why he lives in exile. At one point he turns into the Hulk and nearly destroys the airship. But just before the final battle he says something about always being angry or something like that and suddenly he has full control over himself. What happened? Edit 3: The Dark Knight For someone who according to his own words doesn't have a plan, Joker seems to be working on a very thight schedule. Also his crew of Arkham Asylum inmates who all are supposedly insane seem to be strangely dependable. The Dark Knight Rises: Why didn't Bane and Talia just blow Gotham Up the second they get control over the nuke? And how does Batman survide the blast and the radiation of a nuke? With only like 2 seconds left on the timer it is impossible to escape. And why isn't Blake blind despite staring right into the explosion? And why isn't Gotham a Fallout-esque Wasteland? And what did Blake ever do to deserve to become Batman? How could he figure out that Wayne is Batman just by looking at him? Why is Officer Gordon suddenly retarded? I always thought that he probably had it figured out (remember that scene after Bruce saves Reese from getting killed by running a red light and raming a care that was about to ambush Gordon's plice truck?) but didn't care because for him Batman was a symbol. And then comes that one scene before Batman flies away to sacrifice himself. By that point everyone and their dog know that Bruce is Batman. Which makes it even more painful to se Gordon walk up to Batman and ask "Who are You?", And why didn't anybody think it was a bad idea to sent the majority of the policeforce into the sewers? And why did Batman after becoming a Howard Hughes-like recluse because Rachel died forgot about her so easily and fucked Talia? He locked himself away for 9 years and after Alfred makes a claim that he can't even back up with evidence he simply forgets about here and fucks the next girl that he come across? I knew that this would happen, but it happened so fast. This should've been a huge part of the movie but instead they spent like 15 minutes on it and move on. They never even mention again that Alfred HAS LEFT THEM! Bruces father figure, the man who always know the right words to say at any occasion, leaves and apart from that one moment when no one opens the door he doesn't seem to care. And did they have to do the Talia plottwist? What was the point of that other than pleasing all the comic-nerd that knew who Talia was? Her character added nothing to the movie and was in it way to little for me to care about her and that twist. And in the end it didn't change anything. And it robbed bane the chance to be anything more than a gloryfied henchman. I know, wall of text. The strange thing is I still enjoyed that movie...

I've watches some let's plays of this. Is it weird that I sympathize with Jorji? I know he is contrabanding drugs and all that, but his perseverance and his friendly demeanor (I don't think I've ever heard of a drug smuggler that got caught and then tells the costums inspector that cought him that he does a good job) and the fact that make him such a funny character.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hvVlKvoY18 ...the fuck? I love this band and their LMO album but this video is just plain silly. I especially love the part when they all just freeze in pose and stare into the air like idiots. And what has that girl done to this gathering of medieval street artists and fire-breathers that they want to burn her? Why is the band participating? And why is nobody burning at the stake in the end? The fact that the story of the song (and the accompanying album) is about a woman that was falsely accused of witchcraft and then beheaded is focused so much on burning someone at the stake is confusing anyway.

But that was more than 10 years ago. I'd set them all to friendship but leave the loyalty for Hall & Nash and HHH & HBK.

Maybe Hall, Nash and X-Pac should be loyal to eachother. Hunter and HBK probably too. But are Hunter and HBK really that close to the three aforementioned guys? Or is Justin Credible that close to any of the aforementioned guys? Hypothetically, do you really think HHH or HBK would leave WWE if they re-hired Pac or Hall for a Nostalgia Run and fired them? Because from reading this thread this is what a loyality relationship implies in this game.

How about you go for an entirely different name? Total Nonstop Honor, Ring Of action and any of the other combinations of TNA and ROH for that matter sounds ridiculous. When I started my "TNA goes bankrupt and Spike TV form their own promotion" scenario I called it PURE Pro Wrestling. I named the championships "PURE World Heavyweight", "PURE Television" etc.

How about if we put the whole "playability" vs "completism" thing to the vote? I feel like we're going in circles here. Someone says "delete so-and-so because they haven't been active in x years", then someone else says "but someone might use them", rinse and repeat with the occasional "LEAVE BILL ALONE" post thrown into the mix every now and then.

I'll have to get it for Xbox since my PC is an old, slow pice of shit that I bought in 2007. Or maybe I'll just start saving money to get a decent gaming PC like I wanted to do for years...But these things are so damn expensive...

I don't know if I want this. I didn't enjoy the open world aspect of the last one. It kinda ruined the game for me and destroyed some of the dense atmosphere that made Arkham Asylum so awesome in the first place. And there were too many villans for my taste. Yes, there where a lot of baddies in AA too but to me it felt like there were better intergrated into the story. Talking about the story: It felt like the story of AC was all over the place compared to AA. In AA you pretty much tried to figure out what the Joker was up to and kept running into some other bad guys who were involved along the way, In AC every bad guy sorta did their own thing and the whole "Joker is sick" sub-plot just seemed tacked on in the end. The AA story definitely felt more focused to me. So I'll probably watche some Let's Plays and decide if this feels like an improvement to the last game. Also: Fuck DLC.