Jump to content

January Contest


AJ

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Okay we need some judges. Four to be exact.

You don't have to be a graphics expert. Just know what you like.

If you want to be a judge just take a look at all the entries and rate them 1-10. (.5 decimals are allowed) then PM me your list of scores.

Thanks in advance to anyone who'll judge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn, came within one point :(

Ah well...I came close, atleast. Congrats AJ :thumbsup:

Edit: Out of curiosity, FSF, why'd you give me a 6? I was kinda proud of that graphic, so I'm interested to see your comments as I thought that was one of my better ones in awhile

Edited by Norris Scott
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah sorry I was going to but then I forgot.

Here's the comments Thom made with his ratings:

emad- 6, although I like the bevels, words need to be the focus.

god- 3, too slow, too simple. basic font. all a bit basic.

loonister- 2, it's suppose to be a barely seeable splodge? :P

matbar- 4.5, I take off marks for scanlines, but not the loser on the front, text is simple, it's not bad though.

infinte fire- 6, at least you get the point of the splash. text is basic top left, graphic looks nice but I don't really get it. no focus.

dawson loves balls- 6.5 nice text, something fucking up the background. would've been nice otherwise.

jules- 6, yeah you get the idea, the threads in the background seem a bit dogy (some dark), the 4 over ewb shows a yellow 41 too, which is annoying.

bluesman- 5, deep drop shadow makes it look unprofessional, maybe if you didnt have the little 4 there it would look better. not bad though.

dragon- 3, I know you'll think i'm just doing it because it's you, but you're lucky to get a 3.

boggz- 4, too simple, doesn't even look like it says ewb.

norris- 8, was hoping for something a little better, but I can't actually pick any faults with it... well done.

double x 4- its like a gay parade. far too many colours.

matzat- 5.5, it's hard to rate. does the job, i like it. but.... hmm.

adgray.... wouldnt load?

zachalous- 3.5, meh, same font all over, yellow and blue? main text looks fine though. rest looks a bit hmm.

wiseguy- 5, I don't like it as a splash. You want the focus to be the EWB4. not some random stocks belnded to look pretty.

doccy- 3, pains me to do that. you dont want a reason.

switch- 5.5, it's a worse version of Norris Scott's. I like it though.

iwc- 5.5, I want to give it a good mark because I want you, but I can't. I reckon I could name what you did there in 3/4 steps, that includes the 400% zoom on the pattern overlay B-).

boogey131- 5, was expecting to see something amazing after matzats comment, but it just..... isn't.

aj- 5.5. Nah, too much going on. That's all that's going on. ( icant understand the rave reviews its getting after posting?- its just too many words in one place)

==============================================

i was saving a good score for a good splash.... I don't think you even liked your own?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was trying to portray a futuristic battleground, but I failed =P

The fog around the edges was Halo 2-inspired from the parasite-infested maps, lol.

Glad you liked it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. To learn more, see our Privacy Policy