Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

WHo the hell Wrote this, I'll kill'em!

Don't know if they fixed it up. They better. Maybe its a large typo, they probably meant it for Garfield.

Edited by Laice_
Posted

If it doesn't work...here's what it said:

All Reuters Movie News

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'Harry Potter' Loses Potency Atop U.S. Box Office

Sunday June 13 2:21 PM ET

Harry Potter as a devout high-schooler who gets pregnant following an unsuccessful attempt to cure her boyfriend of homosexuality, has earned $3.7 million to date. The $5 million film was released by United Artists, a unit of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc .

Posted

Well thank god its screwing with potter, I hate and always will hate harry potter, if it stayed as books. Just making it a movie will make it overexposed and then you'll have a bunch of little kids dresing up like the chracters, which really is annoying to me.

Guest TheTokenWhiteGuy
Posted

I liked the books, but there isn't enough time in a movie.

Posted

A big typo that is. Too big for my tastes :P Sorry for overeacting. :blush:

Posted

Harry Potter got pregnant?

IT'S MAGIC!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. To learn more, see our Privacy Policy