Darnez FC Forever

It was a late 99 game. In regards to the name, maybe the WWF let them know during development? Could've been a lucky guess too.

I plan on doing this once this list is complete.

Sorry Ellis - WWF No Mercy was released in 2000 (would've definitely been on my list otherwise)

Sorry Ruki - Majora's Mask was released in 2000.

This is fine

Sorry TKz, but Crash Bash was released in 2000.

HOORAY! ANOTHER VOTING THREAD! Time to find out just what 90s games are the favourites of EWB. Any game released on the 1st Jan 1990 until the 31st December 1999 can be voted for. NOW GET VOTING! (Originally I was going to begin with an 80s list but then realised that era was a bit before my time so if anyone wants to run that list then feel free) Voting instructions and other tidbits: - Vote for 15 games. Less is fine. More is not. - Your number 1 vote will receive 15 points, number 2 will receive 14 points, and so on until number 15 which will receive 1 point. Vote accordingly. - Your voting criteria is completely up to you - as long as the game was released within the determined time period. - Put the game name (full name please, no abbreviations) first and then in brackets put the console it was released for. If the game was released for multiple consoles put down the console you played it on. Now, with scoring - besides the above mentioned system, I am torn between two methods. Do I either add up the points a game receives (as per normal) and then multiply the number by how many people voted for said game? Or do I add up the points a game receives, and then multiply its score by how many first place votes it receives? If you guys would like to weigh in on this by putting down your preferred option (or a completely different option if you have one) on the bottom of your voting ballot then that'd be great. (You don't have to though) Now, my list. 1. Pokemon Red/Blue (Gameboy) 2. The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (Nintendo 64) 3. Tekken 2 (Playstation) 4. Mario Kart 64 (Nintendo 64) 5. WWF WrestleMania 2000 (Nintendo 64) 6. Pokemon Snap (Nintendo 64) 7. Wario Land 2 (Gameboy) 8. Final Fantasy VII (Playstation) 9. Super Mario 64 (Nintendo 64) 10. Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (Sega Megadrive) 11. Crash Bandicoot (Playstation) 12. Metal Gear Solid (Playstation) 13. Goldeneye 007 (Nintendo 64) 14. Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island (Super Nintendo) 15. Banjo-Kazooie (Nintendo 64)

Sure that's fine

Sorry, just saw your response to this. Unfortunately the latest version of the DATA was on my old computer which now ceases to function. I don't think I made too many alterations/additions to the game since I last uploaded it (if I did they were minor things like correcting genders and minor stat changes, maybe a couple of free agents) so if anyone has the latest DATA I uploaded then if they could upload it somewhere that'd be great

This was hard. Mainly because I haven't played that many games that came out this year. 1. Silent Hill: HD Collection (THIS COUNTS DAMMIT) 2. Mass Effect 3 3. Soul Calibur V 4. Halo 4 5. The Darkness 2 6. Hotline Miami 7. Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 8. Far Cry 3 9. Hitman: Absolution 10. TEW 2013

Except an overness of 40/50/60 in an indy federation (depending on which one you're playing as) can mean a wrestler is considered a Main Eventer in said federation. It is based on a WORLD scale, not on a fed-by-fed scale. If you want fed-by-fed (or at the very least area-by-area) play TEW.

1. Ride the Lightning - Metallica 2. Operation: Mindcrime - Queensryche 3. The Number of the Beast - Iron Maiden 4. Prisoners - The Agonist 5. Unto the Locust - Machine Head 6. Worship Music - Anthrax 7. Shogun - Trivium 8. News of the World - Queen 9. The Way of the Fist - Five Finger Death Punch 10. Asylum - Disturbed 11. Renegade - Hammerfall 12. Love Gun - KISS 13. South of Heaven - Slayer 14. The Unexpected - Beautiful Sin 15. Come Clarity - In Flames 16. Nightmare - Avenged Sevenfold 17. Dark Passion Play - Nightwish 18. The Silent Force - Within Temptation 19. Masters of Reality - Black Sabbath 20. Haymaker - Throwdown

That sucks lol

Increase Eliza Sway's Brawl to 45, her Speed to 30, her Technical to 40 and her Overness to 15. Increase KrackerJak's Speed to 33 and his Stiffness to 45. Tick Superstar Look for Rhys Youngblood.

1) You Only Move Twice 2) Homer the Smithers 3) Homer the Great 4) 22 Short Films About Springfield 5) Mayored to the Mob 6) The Itchy and Scratchy and Poochie Show 7) Raging Abe Simpson and his Grumbling Grandson in "The Curse of the Flying Hellfish" 8) Homer at the Bat 9) Brother from Another Series 10) The Last Temptation of Homer Trying to form this list after starting with a list of thirty was bloody difficult. "Lisa the Iconoclast", "Simpson and Delilah", "Marge vs The Monorail", "The Homer They Fall" and "Sideshow Bob Roberts" were extremely hard to cut away.

1. Machine Head 2. Trivium 3. The Agonist 4. Five Finger Death Punch 5. Anthrax 6. Iron Maiden 7. Disturbed 8. Hammerfall 9. Queensryche 10. Within Temptation 11. Sevendust 12. Slayer 13. Chimaira 14. In Flames 15. Throwdown

I think everyone would hate being on the same roster as New Jack.

And here is the Problem. You say "Overness" means how many People knows Heat Slater. I say Overness ist how People reacts to a Wrestler. And you say Overness does not mean a wrestler "sold tickets"? For me this is a big factor in the Overness Value. How many "casual" fans know the WWE Guys that are used almost only for superstars and live events? Not as many as you might think! WWE has more audience no doubt. That does not mean that the casual fans know the worker from the Undercard Yeah...Richards could Main Event a cult promotion with 67. But Slater wouldn't headline any show for ROH. Slater wouldn't headline any Show in Japan. He would be just a guy known from WWE. And the game says fuck your definition of overness. As already explained the game determines overness by how well known the worker is. It is ludicrous to argue that a guy who has never been on national tv in any prominent role is as over or more over (which the game determines as who is more well-known) than someone who is on televisions world wide. Remember, Raw is broadcast on stations in many countries, not just America. You don't get it. A lot of the WWE Guys in the Undercard you never see at RAW or SmackDown. Bateman, Curtis, JTG, Reks, Hawkins, Beretta, Riley, Camacho, Hunico, McIntyre, Jackson, Usos, Mahal, Gabriel, Ryan, McGillicutty, Tatsu and, besides the Legend-Angle, Heath Slater....all these guys are mostly used only for Superstars and NXT. NXT and Superstars runs on the Internet not on national tv. In many Countries you can't see these shows at all. In many countries you can not even see the complete RAW and Smackdown Shows. And if these guys are sometimes used on Smackdown or RAW then as jobbers. (And guess what ... you can see the ROH Weekly free on the ROH website worldwide! And hey...you can't see Superstars (legally) worldwide on the Internet) So you argue that these people are known worldwide even though they are NOT on worldwide television...although they're not even on national TV? Just because they are on wwe.com roster page? And what says the Game really about overness? So if you want the game more realistic then lower also the overness of the WWE and TNA Under Carder If the way overness in EWR works bothers you so much you should just play TEW.

I think most of you are forgetting that, unlike TEW, EWR has ONE number which measures how over someone is in the game. Which means that the biggest promotion in the game is going to be a greater measuring stick in determining how over someone is in comparison to smaller companies. I think people are also forgetting that Indy companies tend to have the same fans attending most of the shows, so of course most of the wrestlers are going to get good reactions - they wrestle in front of similar crowds at any given event. For example, I worked as a cameraman for a local wrestling event last weekend and we pulled a crowd of around 100 people. One of our faces got a HUGE reaction from the crowd - but that doesn't mean he should have a high overness level just because 100 people know who he is and react to him - because I guarantee if you swapped out that crowd for 100 different people his reaction would've been a lot less. If you did the same experiment with The Rock, for example, he would get a huge reaction regardless because he is The Rock and lots of wrestling fans know who he is. And I bet if you did the same experiment again a WWE midcarder would get a bigger reaction than a El Generico or Sami Callihan because more wrestling fans would know who the midcarder is and thus there's more of a chance he'll get a reaction in comparison to the indy wrestlers. If you want a more "accurate" way of measuring overness you should play TEW instead.

If you can point me to any of the great brawls Ezekiel Jackson, Mason Ryan & Alex Riley have had (since that what stats 70+ mean, it means those guys are GREAT at that certain aspect of wrestling) then I'll gladly retract my statement. Ehh, those I don't care about too much. But Orton is one of the best in-ring storytellers in the business. Just because he doesn't use 8 different types of kicks, 3 different elbows, and 2 different punches, doesn't mean he's not great in the ring? Leave his brawl where it is, and understand there is more to matches than just different moves strung together. 79 puts Orton on the level of John Cena, Chris Jericho & CM Punk - I don't see Orton as a better brawler than those three, and besides Cena I don't think Punk or Jericho need their brawl stat raised. I'd raise Cena to 81 and lower Orton to 79. I fully believe that Orton is better than Cena, and I'm not a Cena hater. I like the guy, but his offense is not as believable as Orton's. Other than that, they are very similar, I agree with you on that. Because of the believability factor I put Orton over Cena. BTW, I hope I'm not coming off as an arrogant asshole. I have been told I do when I get into conversations like this and I'm trying not to. I suppose we'll have to agree to disagree then and let Bill decide. And no you're not, don't worry.

If you can point me to any of the great brawls Ezekiel Jackson, Mason Ryan & Alex Riley have had (since that what stats 70+ mean, it means those guys are GREAT at that certain aspect of wrestling) then I'll gladly retract my statement. Ehh, those I don't care about too much. But Orton is one of the best in-ring storytellers in the business. Just because he doesn't use 8 different types of kicks, 3 different elbows, and 2 different punches, doesn't mean he's not great in the ring? Leave his brawl where it is, and understand there is more to matches than just different moves strung together. 79 puts Orton on the level of John Cena, Chris Jericho & CM Punk - I don't see Orton as a better brawler than those three, and besides Cena I don't think Punk or Jericho need their brawl stat raised. I'd raise Cena to 81 and lower Orton to 79.

If you can point me to any of the great brawls Ezekiel Jackson, Mason Ryan & Alex Riley have had (since that what stats 70+ mean, it means those guys are GREAT at that certain aspect of wrestling) then I'll gladly retract my statement.

Disagree with that. His last bout with Kyle O' Reilly was tremendous. I feel Brawl 's stat could be raise. Well, I notice for a lot of guys that the Speed stat was overrated for my taste. For example, I don't see a guy like Clay at 31 (same as Orton, Ryback, Marella and Barrett). For the moment, I updated the Brawl Ladder I did last month (added DGUSA and PWG): That BRAWL list just goes to show you how many wrestlers (especially in WWE) have overinflated stats. Lower Randy Orton's Brawl to 79 Lower Matt Morgan's Brawl to 75 Lower Ezekiel Jackson's Brawl to 68 Lower Alex Riley's Brawl to 66 Lower Mason Ryan's Brawl to 60 Lower Robbie T's Brawl to 59 Lower Eve Torres' Brawl to 43 Lower Alicia Fox's Brawl to 41 And that's just at a glance.

1. Kaley Cuoco 2. Keeley Hazell 3. Keira Knightley 4. Minka Kelly 5. Delta Goodrem 6. Hayden Panettiere 7. Jessica Alba 8. Blake Lively 9. Mary Elizabeth Winstead 10. Kristin Kreuk

All right all right Rider you win. I see you've played knifey-spoony before.