Yet another garbage infographic - if Benteke is taking 3.33 shots per game over 15 games, that's.....*maffs*....50 shots. How on earth does he have a 52% shot accuracy with 13 goals, unless that statistic is shots on target over total attempts (a totally useless statistic), or goals over shots on target - which is not a true indicator of "shot accuracy".
It actually seems like chance conversion is the statistic that shot accuracy SHOULD be. (goals over attempts) and that chance conversion should eliminate speculative shots and the like and focus only on clear-cut chances. (which, unless you're Carlton Cole or Welbeck it seems, should always be much higher than your raw shooting percentage)
I mean, it's clear that Benteke was still a prolific striker as it takes no small amount of skill to take nearly four shots a game and score on at least one of them. But it just seems like this was an attempt at some fancy stats that could have been done a lot better. Also I'd wager that there's a trend of the leading strikers in lower-half teams' numbers in this type of table being higher post-2013 than they are in the pre-2013 half of the season.
They take in count the shots saved as shots on target, it's dumb