I'm failing to see what your point is, now.
For starters, when did I mention anyone being worthy of the Hall of Fame? Especially Edgar Martinez? He's viewed as a potential Hall of Famer, but not be me, and I sure as hell didn't bring that up, so excuse my confusion.
And if you want to compare him to David Ortiz (for what reason, I don't know), that's fine. You want a home-run hitter? Ortiz is your man. But if you want someone with a career .312 average (as opposed to Ortiz's .281) or someone who had a career on base percentage over .400, you'd have Martinez. Again, I don't see what that had to do with anything, but by "numbers are already better", I'm assuming you were just talking homeruns and runs batted in.
And what difference does it make if he was in the same line-up as Griffey, A-Rod, and Buhner? How does that make any kind of argument against the DH rule? Or are you still having this phantom argument about whether he deserves to be in the Hall of Fame or not?