EWBFF Reggie "619" Bush Legacy League 2022

[Maxx]

Nyhiem Hines, RB, Colts for DMN ends it

[Maxx]

RESULTS UPLOADED CHECK THEM SET YOUR TEAMS DO STUFF

[Maxx]

Ya'll want to add another flex spot to the roster considering all of our benches are gigantic?

[LL!]

Yeah okay 

[Maxx]

@Your Mom you want another rb/wr/te spot in the starting lineups?

[Your Mom]

Just now, Maxx said:

@Your Mom you want another rb/wr/te spot in the starting lineups?

Yes please. But don't give it to my opponents  

[Maxx]

Nevermind it won't let me add them at all.

A note for next year

[Maxx]

Why do you all let me make rosters that are so gigantic?  This seems very needless even in a Dynasty.

[The Buscher]

I do understand cutting back on active slots for future years but as someone who has used a lot of his active bench spots on injured guys, I think we'd need to increase the IR spots in exchange.

In a normal league, 2 IR is fine but not so much in a Dynasty, since you have to continue to roster hurt players you want for 2023 and beyond.  If we cut down the active slots moving the IR spots to 5 or so would seem right.

[The Buscher]

The 2022 playoff field is decided with a week still to play:  Me, @Plubby, @Slogger, and @Berober

Congrats all.

[Maxx]

Ertz and Goedert haven't played for the last 4 weeks.  They are still ranked TE8 and TE9 in points scored.  They might fall out of the Top 10 this week.  But this is the kind of thing that illustrates why the TE position needs to be abandoned in Fantasy Football. 

[gunnar hendershow]

Kelce would be the number 5 WR. The number 2 TE, who has missed some time this season, is Mark Andrews who would be the number 22 WR. It's ridiculous people keep sticking to this position in fantasy. Make it a WR/TE slot, the top few TEs will be better than the 30th WR who you'd otherwise slot into that position.

The position technically follows a bell curve in points distribution but there's a few outliers who make it broken, unlike WR where if you miss out on Jefferson but have numbers 8 and 14 you're just as if not more well off. No way to make up for the lack of a Kelce.

[Your Mom]

Needless to say Dynasty has not been a success for me in year 1. Papa Bill is not going to like this  

[gunnar hendershow]

13 minutes ago, Your Mom said:

Needless to say Dynasty has not been a success for me in year 1. Papa Bill is not going to like this  

His first year in New England didn't go great either.

[The Buscher]

As someone who took Kyle Pitts in the 2nd round figuring I could possibly be locking down the TE spot for a decade or more, I'd normally be fighting feverishly to keep the position.  But I still think he's someone who, if the Falcons ever figure out how to actually use him, will be a very high volume target worthy of starting.  Thankfully I hedged with Kelce, and that couldn't have worked out better.  Pitts barely matters to me as long as Kelce keeps doing what he's doing.

Don't know if @Slogger would've taken Andrews in the 2nd without a TE spot either given that the point of drafting him is to give you a big positional advantage, but as mentioned he'd be the WR22 right now so at the absolute worst he'd still be a viable starter in any format.

I'd be OK with turning TE into WR/TE.

[Your Mom]

TE should become either WR/TE or Flex from now on

[Maxx]

It 100% is in non Dynasty, we can have more discussion about it in Dynasty just because theoretically, the position could swing back around to being utilized more in the future.

[The Buscher]

Nice of my team to no-show the playoffs after leading the league all year.  Ah well.

[Maxx]

There's always next year!  And in the case of this year, like...literally.

[Berober]

Well well well