MJB Posted July 18, 2013 Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 Two quick wickets leave us right back in the shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted July 18, 2013 Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 Eh. 320ish will be fine. We can bat right down to 10 here, there's only Jimmy not really capable of getting a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJB Posted July 18, 2013 Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 Prior gone aswell. I know his game is to play shots but he needs to adapt better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berober Posted July 18, 2013 Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 Don't panic guys, it's time for WAR ANDERSON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted July 18, 2013 Report Share Posted July 18, 2013 Guess you have to be happy after the start we had, but kinda disappointed with what could have been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJB Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 Bresnan gone first ball of the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starvinho Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 Broad and Swann trying to make a last wicket stand. Could easily get a few between them. 350 would be nice, 400 could be a test winning score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 400 is optimistic. I'm confident in our ability to bowl them out anyway, so I'm fine with 330. I think these two think they're playing T20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plubby Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 Good, quality tail-end batting. Need to treat these guys like they're batsmen. Keep them honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 Broad and Swann should never really be the final wicket partnership. Both are decent batsmen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plubby Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 Pattinson back into the attack. Well at least we're expecting him to be taken to all corners Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starvinho Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 361 all out. Very happy with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plubby Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 JESUS CHRIST STUART CHEATING BROAD IF YOU DIDN'T HIT IT YOU WOULD HAVE REVIEWED IT STRAIGHT AWAY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 Broad and Swann should never really be the final wicket partnership. Both are decent batsmen. They weren't really. It was only because Anderson was night watchman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plubby Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 The more I see this, the more I have a problem with it. If the umpire doesn't give you out, you've NO obligation to walk. But if you hit it, and you're given - you either know you hit it, or you don't. If you don't know, review immediately. If you know...and you review, you are trying to overturn a correct umpiring decision. That, to me, is cheating. It's enabled by the rules, but I hate this one. No issue with him not walking in the first test, but this one made me a little mad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 I think he was hoping for a no ball more than anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starvinho Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 Here we go now, Anderson wicket in the first over... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plubby Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 When you're the tenth wicket, why the delay then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 I had the golf on and thought you were saying he'd got a wicket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted July 19, 2013 Report Share Posted July 19, 2013 When you're the tenth wicket, why the delay then? Why delay anyway? My guess is he said something like "I think I hit it" and Swann said "might as well review it, could be a no ball". I don't see how delaying = cheating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts