Jump to content

UEFA Champions League 2020/21


Lineker

Recommended Posts

Just now, metalman said:

I know I'm just kidding (and I actually quite like baseball - it's the one exception to my generally flawless taste in things)

I'm just jealous...that and it's like I can't even back either team. The only over riding thought is Chelsea winning would be less annoying than Man City

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DavidMarrio said:

I'm just jealous...that and it's like I can't even back either team. The only over riding thought is Chelsea winning would be less annoying than Man City

There's that but I also think it would be quite funny if Manchester had more teams with European Cups than London

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually a little more invested in their upcoming match this weekend in the league than that finals. With this and the finals of the Europa League, it's just been a bit of a bland finish to the European competitions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Quote

Portugal has emerged as a strong candidate to host this season's Champions League final after UEFA failed to gain guarantees over the exemptions it requires to move the game to Wembley.

BBC Sport has been told European football's governing body has resolved that the match between Manchester City and Chelsea on 29 May will not be played in Turkey as planned due to the impracticality of fans from England being able to attend.

However, those issues do not arise in Portugal, which is on the green list.

UEFA also feel it is going to be easier to gain access for sponsors and broadcasters, who would need to be compensated if they were unable to attend the game.

The match could still be played at Wembley but it would require a major shift from the Government, who failed to reach agreement with UEFA in talks today.

Porto has been mentioned as a potential venue but it is understood Lisbon, which hosted last year's final, is also a possibility.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Adam said:

Presumably the driving factor in that is so all the officials and dignitaries can attend? Stuff the fans of the clubs involved, as usual.

Yes - moving the final to London was ruled out because they couldn't guarantee all the dignitaries could attend. It looks like Portugal will allow it, and allow fans in, it was just taken off whichever colour list it is that the UK has.

Still ridiculous that each club only gets 6,000 fans each, whilst dignitaries get 17,000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fully convinced UEFA is having the Final in Portugal instead of England to be the spiteful/petty girlfriend to get back at their boyfriend for starting a (completely ridiculous, unnecessary) fight. I wholly approve of it for the hilarity factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Admin
Quote

Chelsea have returned more than 800 unsold tickets for the Champions League final with Manchester City in Porto.

The Blues were given 5,800 tickets by Uefa for Saturday's game and there was a high demand for 2,800 tickets which were sold with independent travel.

However, the unsold tickets were part of a charter package, which included subsidised flights at £200.

Chelsea Supporter Trust board member Dan Silver said: "Uefa's lack of care for fans has again come to the fore."

He added: "They came to be our friends over the European Super League but now they have turned their backs on us again.

"Uefa's insistence on having charter flights - initially linked to 90% of tickets, which the clubs pushed back on - spending only 24 hours in Portugal with added Covid testing and additional costs have made it very prohibitive.

"Selling tickets for up to 400 euros for a limited access final with unnecessary travel is outrageous when there were obvious solutions closer to home."

A capacity of 16,500 has been confirmed for the 50,000-capacity Dragao Stadium.

Uefa has been criticised for its pricing policy. Tickets start at 70 euros (£60.50) and rise to 400 euros (£346).

However, European football's governing body is facing some huge financial challenges.

It is estimated Uefa's pre-Covid reserves of 500m euros (£432.64m) will have shrunk to just over 100m euros (£86.53m) by 2023.

That financial impact is a direct result of the costs incurred in moving the European Championship back by a year - resulting in rebates to broadcasters and sponsors and refunds to ticket holders, plus the cost of Covid testing and mitigation measures for the rescheduled tournament.

It explains why Uefa was so keen to get both their prestige club finals played in front of fans and get commitments from Euro 2020 venues about supporter numbers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. To learn more, see our Privacy Policy